Pros and cons Of Online Education For the World Person
More and more young people are going for non-traditional education to start and advance in their careers while completing and furthering their formal education. “Typical distance individuals are those who don’t have access to programs, employees who work during scheduled class hours, homebound individuals, self-motivated individuals who wish to take courses for self-knowledge or advancement, or those who are not capable or not willing to go to class” (Charp, 2000, p. 10). Three important components encircle the online novice: technology, course load, and instructor (Bedore, Bedore, & Bedore, 1997). These elements must be keenly built-into one efficiently and operationally functional delivery tool.
While an online method of education can be a highly effective alternative medium of education for the mature, self-disciplined student, it is an inappropriate learning environment for more dependent individuals. Online asynchronous education gives students control Dr. Philipp Heinrich Kindt over their learning experience, and allows for flexibility of study schedules for not for traditional students; however, this places a greater responsibility on the student. In order to successfully participate in an online program, student must be well organized, self-motivated, and possess a high degree of time management skills so that up with the pace of the course. Hence, online education or e-learning is not befitting younger students (i. e. elementary or supplementary school age), and other students who are dependent individuals and have difficulty
assuming responsibilities required by the online paradigm.
Millions of students use e-learning solutions in over one hundred and forty countries: firms such as Kodak and Toyota and education providers like ExecuTrain, New Horizons, the Enoch Olinga College (ENOCIS), Phoenix University amongst the hundreds of schools and colleges.
Studies have shown student maintenance to be up to 250% better with online learning than with class room courses. Several recent ones have helped frame the debate. The Sloan Consortium published a widely distributed report called “Growing by Degrees: Online Education in the united states in 2005” that examined the growing prevalence of online education across You. S. institutions.
In addition, a survey conducted by the Boston-based consulting firm Eduventures found that, while about half of institutions and more than 60 percent of employers generally accept the high quality of online learning, students’ awareness differ. Just thirty-three percent of prospective online students said that they perceive the standard of online education to be “as good as or better than” face-to-face education. Ironically, 36 percent of prospective students surveyed specified concern about employers’ acceptance of online education as a reason for their unwillingness to enroll in online courses.
But what actually drives quality? A 03 2006 report released by the You. S. Department of Education’s Office of Postsecondary Education identifies six quality indicators: mission, course load and instruction, school support, student and educational services, planning for sustainability and growth, and evaluation and assessment.
The debate rages on while the Pros and cons of Online Adult Education for today’s international students are constantly analyzed to determine if this type of education platform can deliver predictable and measurable results.
The Enoch Olinga College (ENOCIS) is one institution which uses this type of delivery system. ENOCIS enhances their learning experience by offering many other “value added”, cost reducing benefits to students. Online enrollees can apply for scholarship grants available to students of excellence and other financial aid programs like the Parent Loan for Undergrad Students (PLUS), with attractive interest rates. They also provide convenient payment facilities, on line banking, Western Union Quick Collect, bank cards and a student who is granted a loan may start paying back it after two months if they have a corporate guarantor.